If I were put behind deep blue and saw it doing that. Even I a player of around 2000 rating can clearly see this. If the computer is going on some sort of pawn grubbing strategy, and leaving the king in danger. This time they totally declined him any chance of redemption.ĥ) Ya, they were able to put together a team to beat Kasparov at chess.Ħ) Human's can prune lines that an engine can not see as bad. He immediately offered a rematch which they accepted. IBM has done NOTHING with chess since this event.Ĥ) Kasparov defeated deep blue the year before. then packing the bags, going home, and moving on never to venture into space again. It's the equivalent of putting a man on mars. It's the equivalent of a chef showing you the food they have made, but not how they cooked it up.Ģ) Dismantling it is a way of getting rid of the evidence. Nothing like that was shown, just the end result. The operators could see what deep blue thought was best, and how it changed it's mind, "What is the strongest line at this point in time" according to the machine. Lurarose None of the thought process of deep blue was recorded or shown. would it have not increased if Deep Blue wasn't "fake"?Ħ) can it? an engine already prunes lines (usually), i don't see why a human also has toħ) who could have possibly helped? they would obviously need to be a strong GM to engineer moves that would have beat Kasparov, and chess players generally don't act so slimy at that level.
WHAT IS THE REATING ON THE DEEP BLUE CHESS GAME SOFTWARE
Ianremsen edited what should have been shown? what you see from an engine today? i doubt the software returned any sort of helpful information because it was built for a very specific purpose that not include user friendly outputĢ) if they had faked the result, why would they need to dismantle it? it's not like they were loaning it out at the library for people to hook up and try outģ) a lot of research was put into deep blue's construction, and deep blue was the first one to implement these advances in engine theory.ĥ) of course it did, it showed off ibm's engineering prowess.
0 kommentar(er)
